Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leslie Whiting-Poitras's avatar

Spot on. Old enough to remember when we had a real public health system with public health depts that did more than collect stats. We had public health nurses that visited with people, tracked contacts and were an integral part of the community. Horrifying to see public health become politicized. The CDC publicly stating they were changing guidelines to consider the economic impact was mind blowing and showed they have lost all claims to legitimacy. I'm a retired FNP. The CDC used to be my go to. I now use you as a resource first followed by some other international sites. It is extremely hard to find a reliable source that has scientific basis without political penetration shaping it's narrative

Expand full comment
Phil Boucher, M.D.'s avatar

Agreed. I (pediatrician here) posted a reel on my instagram about this very topic of drinking infected milk and asked on stories how many of my audience drink raw milk. Staggeringly few drink raw milk despite the way that many perceive EVERYONE ELSE as drinking raw milk based on tiktoks and instagrams.

I think it helps to share the mental math as a trusted resource on how we categorize and weigh risk.

Do I drink raw milk? No....we just don't drink much cow's milk period and it seems like a lot of work to go about even getting raw milk if i was so inclined.

Do i lose sleep over people drinking raw milk if they wish (hopefully from someone following the raw milk standards)? Also no.

Is drinking infected raw milk a good plan to protect against H5N1? Big no specifically because we have evidence of infection from animals.

If we as the trusted messengers turn everything into a catastrophe it's really hard to keep our audience engaged but when we instead focus on how we arrive at our recommendations, the limits of our knowledge, and how much weight we give to our reccomendations.

Expand full comment
69 more comments...

No posts