And why do “ stigmatized people will also be subject to poorer care to treat disease,”?
I suggest that not know if condoms help is a serious failing of the healthcare community.
I would strongly disagree about smoking and sex. Smoking is chemical dependency and sex with multiple partners that is high risk for spreading a virus is downrigh…
And why do “ stigmatized people will also be subject to poorer care to treat disease,”?
I suggest that not know if condoms help is a serious failing of the healthcare community.
I would strongly disagree about smoking and sex. Smoking is chemical dependency and sex with multiple partners that is high risk for spreading a virus is downright selfish. Physical intimacy with multiple partners is as strong a need a chemical dependency is, on the face of it all, political pandering. Is that now a new conatituoright?
Back to not know if a condom protects - there is no excuse. You should be more outraged At that than no money for a
Vaccine. Mitigating the disease ( wear a mask and stand 6ft apart) should be more important than treating it.
Not wanting To mitigate MP is likely the
Politics. We wore useles masks and still require them in some schools today, that we know are ineffective.
Sorry - it’s all political pandering by the public health officials and in some way, you too appear, to tacitly support risky behavior as a need instead of a danger. I just don’t get it.
We know that it's more than condom use. Condoms do NOT stop transmission of MPV because contact with the lesions on the skin, or contaminated saliva, etc., is sufficient. You're ascribing to politics your own beliefs and biases, from what I can tell. PH personnel are not pandering to anyone. We are emphasizing that MPV is not an STI, and can affect anyone.
You don't get it.
I'm not trying to be severe, but you are apparently lacking a holistic view of what we do and are trying to accomplish.
OK - its not a STI - 95% of all cases are transmitted by sexual encounters.... Not my #'s.
Call it what you will be it is being spread overwhelmingly by M2M sexual encounters - NEJM is the source.
Please tell me what i do not get. If the disease was called applepox and spread by eating apples you would suggest (I hope) that people stop eating those apples until the curve was flattened. sheeeshhh...
thats my point. Everyone fighting the concept that the source should be addressed and stigmatized if that is what it takes to stop the spread. If you get rid of the source you do not need to worry about the effect IF...
The correct approach to this is to initiate ring vaccination protocols and contact tracing for anyone/everyone involved and not to worry about what to call it or which group to blame. The gay community is already aware of the issues and public health outreach to them is already in full swing. That the spread is currently primarily transmitted by sexual activity won't persist because it's contact with lesions that's the primary cause.
And why do “ stigmatized people will also be subject to poorer care to treat disease,”?
I suggest that not know if condoms help is a serious failing of the healthcare community.
I would strongly disagree about smoking and sex. Smoking is chemical dependency and sex with multiple partners that is high risk for spreading a virus is downright selfish. Physical intimacy with multiple partners is as strong a need a chemical dependency is, on the face of it all, political pandering. Is that now a new conatituoright?
Back to not know if a condom protects - there is no excuse. You should be more outraged At that than no money for a
Vaccine. Mitigating the disease ( wear a mask and stand 6ft apart) should be more important than treating it.
Not wanting To mitigate MP is likely the
Politics. We wore useles masks and still require them in some schools today, that we know are ineffective.
Sorry - it’s all political pandering by the public health officials and in some way, you too appear, to tacitly support risky behavior as a need instead of a danger. I just don’t get it.
We know that it's more than condom use. Condoms do NOT stop transmission of MPV because contact with the lesions on the skin, or contaminated saliva, etc., is sufficient. You're ascribing to politics your own beliefs and biases, from what I can tell. PH personnel are not pandering to anyone. We are emphasizing that MPV is not an STI, and can affect anyone.
You don't get it.
I'm not trying to be severe, but you are apparently lacking a holistic view of what we do and are trying to accomplish.
OK - its not a STI - 95% of all cases are transmitted by sexual encounters.... Not my #'s.
Call it what you will be it is being spread overwhelmingly by M2M sexual encounters - NEJM is the source.
Please tell me what i do not get. If the disease was called applepox and spread by eating apples you would suggest (I hope) that people stop eating those apples until the curve was flattened. sheeeshhh...
thats my point. Everyone fighting the concept that the source should be addressed and stigmatized if that is what it takes to stop the spread. If you get rid of the source you do not need to worry about the effect IF...
https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-health-and-wellness/monkeypox-driven-overwhelmingly-sex-men-major-study-finds-rcna39564
The correct approach to this is to initiate ring vaccination protocols and contact tracing for anyone/everyone involved and not to worry about what to call it or which group to blame. The gay community is already aware of the issues and public health outreach to them is already in full swing. That the spread is currently primarily transmitted by sexual activity won't persist because it's contact with lesions that's the primary cause.