I read a lot of material on both sides of this increasing schism. My background is in social science and history, not medicine. I have both a healthy trust and mistrust of institutions. For example, I respect and trust our local epidemiologist and Robert Kennedy and Madhava Setty because they've all graduated with distinctions from ou…
I read a lot of material on both sides of this increasing schism. My background is in social science and history, not medicine. I have both a healthy trust and mistrust of institutions. For example, I respect and trust our local epidemiologist and Robert Kennedy and Madhava Setty because they've all graduated with distinctions from our finest schools, proving their expertise in their fields of science, medicine, statistics, and law. I don't trust our media so much. So when you say RFK is the #1 source of disinfo, where do you get that from? Have you ever critically evaluated those hit pieces? They don't seem honest to me. Which is why I'd love to see a real dialogue between qualified experts, not an argument.
I read a lot of material on both sides of this increasing schism. My background is in social science and history, not medicine. I have both a healthy trust and mistrust of institutions. For example, I respect and trust our local epidemiologist and Robert Kennedy and Madhava Setty because they've all graduated with distinctions from our finest schools, proving their expertise in their fields of science, medicine, statistics, and law. I don't trust our media so much. So when you say RFK is the #1 source of disinfo, where do you get that from? Have you ever critically evaluated those hit pieces? They don't seem honest to me. Which is why I'd love to see a real dialogue between qualified experts, not an argument.
Also--really?
Why do you peddle evil?
Yawn.